This monograph analyzes one of the key phenomena of our time — the influence of false information on human behavior during the COVID-19 crisis. Issues of trust in information, resilience to disinformation, and the formation of public behavior in the digital age extend far beyond a single crisis and touch upon all aspects of modern society. The author employs an interdisciplinary approach, combining socio-logical, behavioral, and communication analysis methods, consistently uncovering the theoretical foundations of the concepts of "rumors," "fake news," and "conspiracy theories," focusing on the specifics of their dissemination on social media. The findings on the relationship between susceptibility to rumors and fake news and individual characteristics (age, presence of children, level of trust in the government, etc.) are of scientific value. The author also identifies patterns of behavior under conditions of information uncertainty. These results provide a starting point for developing effective crisis communication strategies, including government measures to combat disinformation. For specialists in the field of sociology and social psychology.
Corona pandemic, COVID-19, rumours, fake news, human behaviour, resistance, restrictions, critical att itude, mitigation measures, social media
1. Aaronovitch, D. Voodoo Histories: The Role of the Conspiracy Theory in Shaping Modern History. — London: Jonathan Cape, 2009. — 400 P.
2. Alexander, J. E. How to Evaluate and Create Information Quality on the Web. — New York: L. Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1999. — 148 p.
3. Allport, G. W. The psychology of rumour. — New York: Henry Holt & Co,
4. — 247 p.
5. Aphiwongsophon, S. Detecting Fake News with Machine Learning Method. — Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University, 2018. — 531 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTICon.2018.8620051
6. Artifical Intelligence for Human Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science / Ed. by T. S. Hunag, A. Nijholt, M. Pantic, A. Pentland. — Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Netherlands, 2007. — P. 47–71.
7. Atteslander, P. Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. — Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag, 2006. — 345 s.
8. Berger-Grabner, D. Angewandte qualitative Sozialforschung: Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten in den Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften. — Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler, 2016. — 260 p.
9. Bergmann, J. R. Discreet indiscretions: The social organization of gossip. — New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1993. — 206 p.
10. Björn, R. Quantitative Methoden 2: Einführung in die Statistik für Psychologen und Sozialwissenschaftler. — Berlin: Springer, 2014. — 165 p.
11. Bortz, J., Döring, N. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation: Qualitative und Quantitative Methoden. — Berlin: Springer, 2002. — 783 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07299-8
12. Burzan, N. Quantitative Methoden kompakt. — München: UVK Verlag, 2015. — 174 s. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838537658
13. Eastin, M. S. Digital media, youth and credibility. — London: MIT Press, 2008. — 202 P.
14. Georgeou, N. State Responses to COVID-19: a global snapshot at 1 June 2020 — Sydney: HADRI / Western Sydney University, 2020. — 136 p.
15. Gupta, M. Proceedings of the 12th SIAM International Conference on Data Mining / M. Gupta, P. Zhao, J. Han // Anaheim: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Publications, 2012. — 1150 p. — P. 153–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611972825.14
16. Honigsbaum, M. A history of the great influenza pandemics: death, panic and hysteria, 1830–1920. — London: I. B. Tauris, 2013. — 320 p.
17. Jones, M. Fake: The art of deception. — London: The British Museum, 1990. — 312 p. — P. 11–16.
18. Kelle, U. Empirische Forschungsmethoden. Lehrer-Schüler-Interaktion.– Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2008. — 63 s.
19. McCroskey, J. C. An introduction to rhetorical communication. — London: Allyn and Bacon, 1997. — 307 p.
20. Lilleker, D. G. Evidence to the Culture, Media and Sport Committee ‘Fake news’ inquiry presented by the Faculty for Media & Communication. — Bournemouth: Bournemouth University, 2017. — 6 p.
21. Liu, F. Rumors on social media in disasters: extending transmission to retransmission / F. Liu, A. Burton-Jones, D. Xu // Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS). — Kaohsiung: National Sun Yat-sen University, 2014.– 389 p.
22. Pantic, M. Human Computing and Machine Understanding of Human Behavior : A Survey. Artifical Intelligence for Human Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. — Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2007. — 71 p.
23. Plotnick, L. Real or Fake? User Behavior and Attitudes Related to Determining the Veracity of Social Media Posts / L. Plotnick, S. R. Hiltz, S. Grandhi [et al.] // Proceedings of the ISCRAM Asia-Pacific Conference 2018 / Ed. by K. Stock, D. Bunker. — Wellington: Massey University, 2019. — P. 439–449.
24. Riescher, G. Theorien der Vergleichenden Regierungslehre: Eine Einführung / G. Riescher, M. Obrecht, T. Haas. — München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, 2011. — 134 s. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/9783486714302
25. Rosenstock, I. M. Health Belief Model / I. M. Rosenstock // Encyclopedia of Psychology : [in 8 volumes]. Vol. 4. / Ed. by A. E. Kazdin. — London: Oxford University Press, 2000. — 546 p.
26. Skinner, B. F. Science and Human Behavior / B. F. Skinner — Cambridge: The B. F. Skinner Foundation, 1965. — 461 P.
27. Information technology and moral philosophy / Ed. by J. v. d. Hoven, J. Weckert. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. — 428 p.
28. Walter, H. Forschungsmethoden in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften für Bachelor. — Berlin: Springer, 2013. — 333 s.
29. Weiner, B. An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion. — New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986. — 304 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1
30. Weiss, R. The Provisions of Social Relationships. Doing unto Others. — Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1974. — P. 176.
31. Wierzbicki, A. Polish-Belarusian relations. Between a common past and the future / A. Wierzbicki. — Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2018. — 207 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845291147
32. Wierzbicki, A. Web Content Credibility. — Berlin: Springer, 2018. — 233 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77794-8
33. Zhao, Z. Enquiring minds: early detection of rumors in social media from enquiry posts / Z. Zhao, P. Resnic, Q. Mei // Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web WWW ’15. — Florence: International World Wild Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2015. — 1561 p. — P. 1395–1405.
34. Articles
35. Abu-Akel, A. The effect of spokesperson attribution on public health message sharing during the COVID-19 pandemic / A. Abu-Akel, A. Spitz, R. West // PLoS ONE. — 2021. — Vol. 16. — No. 2. — Article e0245100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245100; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LMUKXT
36. Akseer, N. COVID-19 Pandemic and Mitigation Strategies: Implications for Maternal and Child Health and Nutrition / N. Akseer, G. Kandru, E. C. Keats, Z. A. Bhutta // American Journal for Clinical Nutrition. — 2020. — No.112. — P. 251–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa171; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/POFFTI
37. Alkhodair, S. Detecting breaking news rumors of emerging topics in social media / S. Alkhodair, S. Ding, B. Fung, J. Liu // Information Processing & Management. — 2019. — Vol. 57. — No. 2. — Article 102018. — P. 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.02.016
38. Appelman, A. Measuring message credibility: Construction and validation of an exclusive scale / A. Appelman, S. S. Sundar // Journal of Communication. — 2016. — Vol. 66. — No. 1. — P. 59–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015606057
39. Arafat, S. Psychological underpinning of panic buying during pandemic (COVID-19) / S. M. Arafat, S. K. Kar, M. Marthoenis, P. Sharma, E. H. Apu, R. Kabir // Psychiatry Research. — 2020. — Vol. 289. — Article No. 113061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113061
40. Aschwanden, A. A roadmap towards credible projections of ice sheet contribution to sea level / A. Aschwanden, T. C. Bartholomaus, D. J. Brinkerhoff, M. Truffer // The Cryosphere. — 2020. — Vol. 15. — No. 12. — P. 5705–5715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5705-2021
41. Baek, Y. M. Fake News Should Be Regulated Because It Influences Both “Others” and “Me”: How and Why the Influence of Presumed Influence Model Should Be Extended / Y. M. Baek, H. Kang, S. Kim // Mass Communication and Society. — 2019 — Vol. 22. — No. 3. — P. 301–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1562076
42. Bakir, V. Fake news and the economy of emotions: problems, causes, solutions / V. Bakir, A. McStay // Digital Journalism. — 2018. — Vol. 6. — No. 2. — P. 154–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1345645
43. Banas, J. A. A meta-analysis of research on inoculation theory / J. A. Banas, S. A. Rains // Communication Monographs. — 2010. — Vol. 77. — No. 3. — P. 281–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751003758193
44. Baral, S. Leveraging Epidemiological Principles to Evaluate Sweden’s COVID-19 Response / S. Baral, R. Chandler, R. G. Prieto [et al.] // Annals of epidemiology. — 2021. — Vol. 54. — P. 21–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.11.005; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SRGDBY
45. Basol, M. Good news about bad news: gamified inoculation boosts confidence and cognitive immunity against fake news / M. Basol, J. Roozenbeek, S. van der Linden // Journal of Cognition. — 2020. — Vol. 3. — No. 1. — Article No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.91
46. Bastick, Z. Would You Notice if Fake News Changed Your Behavior? An Experiment on the Unconscious Effects of Disinformation / Z. Bastick // Computers in Human Behavior. — 2021. — Vol. 116. — Article No. 106633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106633
47. Bateman, C. Paying the price for AIDS denialism / C. Bateman // South African Medical Journal. — 2007. — Vol. 97. — No. 10. — P. 912–914.
48. Bish, A. Demographic and Attitudinal Determinants of Protective Behaviors During a Pandemic: A Review / A. Bish, S. Michie // British Journal of Health Psychology. — 2010. — Vol. 15. — No. 4. — P. 797–824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/135910710X485826
49. Bode, L. See something, say something: Correction of global health misinformation on social media / L. Bode, E. K. Vraga // Health Communication. — 2018. — Vol. 33. — No. 9. — P. 1131–1140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1331312
50. Boehm, L. E. The validity effect: A search for mediating variables / L. E. Boehm // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. — 1994. — Vol. 20. — No. 3. — P. 285 — 293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294203006; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JPAMTT
51. Brotherton, R. Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: the generic conspiracist beliefs scale / R. Brotherton, C. C. French, A. D. Pickering // Frontiers of Psychology. — 2013. — Vol. 4. — Article No. 279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279
52. Bruine de Bruin, W. Decision-Making Competence: More Than Intelligence? / W. Bruine de Bruin, A. M. Parker, B. Fischhoff // Current Directions in Psychological Science. — 2020. — Vol. 29. — No. 2. — P. 186–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420901592; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TICWEO
53. Bryanov K. Determinants of individuals’ belief in fake news: A scoping review determinants of belief in fake news / K. Bryanov, V. Vziatysheva // PLoS One. — 2021. — Vol. 16. — No. 6. — Article No. e0253717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253717
54. Buchanan, T. Why Do People Spread False Information Online? The Effects of Message and Viewer Characteristics on Self-Reported Likelihood of Sharing Social Media Disinformation / T. Buchanan // PLOS One. — 2020. — Vol. 15. — No. 10. — Article No. e0239666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239666
55. Champion, V. L. The Health Belief Model / V. L. Champion, C. S. Skinner // Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, research, and practice / Ed. by K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, K. Viswanath. — San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2008. — P. 45–65.
56. Cherian, V. Assessment of timely immunization in an urbanized agglomeration of East Delhi, India / V. Cherian, N. K. Saini, A. K. Sharma // International Journal of Community Medical Public Health. — 2019. — Vol. 6. — No. 3. — P. 1156–1161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20190603
57. Cinelli, M. The COVID-19 Social Media Infodemic / M. Cinelli, W. Quattrociocchi, A. Galeazzi [et al.] // Scientific Reports. — 2020. — Vol. 10. — No. 1. — Article No. 16598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5
58. Cinelli, M. The echo chamber effect on social media. / M. Cinelli, G. D. F. Morales, A. Galeazzi [et al.] // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. — 2021. — Vol. 118. — No. 9. — Article No. e2023301118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
59. Clayton, K. Real solutions for fake news? Measuring the effectiveness of general warnings and fact-check tags in reducing belief in false stories on social media / K. Clayton, S. Blair, J. A. Busam [et al.] // Political Behavior. — 2020. — Vol. 42. — No. 4. — P. 1073–1095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09533-0; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BTRRWQ
60. Clement, J. Number of global social network user (2017–2025) / J. Clement. — 2020. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/ (retrieved on 30.09.2020).
61. Clinton, J. Partisan pandemic: How partisanship and public health concerns affect individuals’ social mobility during COVID-19 / J. Clinton, J. Cohen, J. Lapinski [et al.] // Science Advances. — 2021. — Vol. 7. — No. 2. — Article No. eabd7204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd7204; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VGIFPZ
62. Colizzi, M. Medically unexplained symptoms in the times of COVID-19 pandemic: A case-report / M. Colizzi, R. Bortoletto, M. Silvestri, F. Mondini, E. Puttini, C. Cainelli, R. Gaudino, M. Ruggeri, L. Zoccante // Brain, Behavior, & Immunity — Health. — 2020. — Vol. 5. — Article No. 100073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbih.2020.100073
63. Cristea, I. A. Increase value and reduce waste in research on psychological therapies / I. A. Cristea, F. Naudet // Behaviour research and therapy. — 2019. — Vol. 123. — Article No. 103479 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.103479
64. Dahlgren, G. What Can We Do About Inequalities in Health? / G. Dahlgren, M. Whitehead // Lancet. — 1991. — Vol. 338. — No. 8774. — P. 1059–1063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(91)91911-D
65. De Ceukelaire, W. We need strong public health care to contain the global Corona pandemic / W. De Ceukelaire, C. Bodini // International Journal of Health Services. — 2020. — Vol. 50. — No. 3. — P. 276–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020731420916725; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LWKOZX
66. Dentith, M. R. X. The Problem of Fake News / M. R. X. Dentith // Public Reason. — 2016. — Vol. 8. — No. 1–2. — P. 65–79.
67. Dias, N. Emphasizing publishers does not effectively reduce susceptibility to misinformation on social media / N. Dias, G. Pennycook // Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. — 2020. — Vol. 1. — No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-001
68. Difonzo, N. Reining in rumors / N. Difonzo, P. Bordia, R. L. Rosnow // Organizational Dynamics. — 1994. — Vol. 23. — No. 1. — P. 47–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(94)90087-6
69. Douglas, K. M. The psychology of conspiracy theories / K. M. Douglas, R. M. Sutton, A. Cichocka // Current Directions in Psychology Science. — 2017. — Vol. 26. — No. 6. — P. 538–542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261
70. Eastin, M. S. Extending the digital divide conversation: Examining the knowledge gap through media expectancies / M. S. Eastin, V. Cicchirillo, A. Mabry // Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media. — 2018. — Vol. 62. — No. 3. — P. 379–395.
71. Ebrahim, S. H. Covid-19 and community mitigation strategies in a pandemic / S. H. Ebrahim, Q. A. Ahmed, E. Gozzer, P. Schlagenhauf, Z. A. Memish // BMJ. — 2020. — Vol. 368 — Article No. m1066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1066
72. Eisend, M. Source Credibility Dimensions in Marketing Communication: A Generalized Solution / M. Eisend // Journal of Empirical Generalizations in Marketing Science. — 2006. — Vol. 10. — No. 2. — P. 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15358/0344-1369-2006-JRM-1-43
73. Engels, R. The social construction of crisis: Media narratives and public perception during pandemics / R. Engels // Mass Communication and Society. — 2021. — Vol. 24. — No. 2. — P. 235–257.
74. Foy, J. E. Would a madman have been so wise as this? The effects of source credibility and message credibility on validation / J. E. Foy, P. C. LoCasto, S. W. Briner, S. Dyar // Memory & Cognition. — 2017. — Vol. 45. — P. 281–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0656-1
75. Gentili, C. Challenges and Opportunities for Human Behavior Research in the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic / C. Gentili, I. A. Cristea // Frontiers in Psychology. — 2020. — Vol. 11. — Article No. 1786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01786
76. Gelfert, A. Fake News — A Definition. / A. Gelfert // Informal Logic. — 2018. — Vol. 38. — No. 1. — P. 84–117 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v38i1.5068
77. Goldman, A. I. The social epistemology of blogging / A. I. Goldman // Information Technology and Moral Philosophy / Ed. by J. v. d. Hoven, J. Weckert. — Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press, 2008. — P. 111–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498725.007
78. Gollwitzer, A. Partisan Differences in Physical Distancing are Linked to Health Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic / A. Gollwitzer, C. Martel, W. J. Brady // Nature Human Behaviour. — 2020. — Vol. 4. — No. 11. — P. 1186–1197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00977-7; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LAIOGF
79. Graeupner, D. The dark side of meaning-making: how social exclusion leads to superstitious thinking / D. Graeupner, A. Coman // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. — 2017. — Vol. 69. — P. 218–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.003
80. Greene, C. M. Quantifying the Effects of Fake News on Behavior: Evidence from a Study of COVID-19 Misinformation / C. M. Greene, G. Murphy // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. — 2021. — Vol. 27. — No. 4. — P. 773–784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000371; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DQJVXC
81. Greyling, C. Lessons from the Faith-Driven Response to the West Africa Ebola Epidemic / C. Greyling, J. A. Maulit, S. Parry [et al.] // The Review of Faith & International Affairs. — 2016. — Vol. 14. — No. 3. — P. 118–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2016.1215829
82. Guess, A. Does counter-attitudinal information cause backlash? Results from three large survey experiments / A. Guess, A. Coppock // British Journal of Political Science. — 2018. — Vol. 50. — No. 4. — P. 1497–1515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000327
83. Haug, N. Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions / N. Haug, L. Geyrhofer, A. Londei [et al.] // Nature Human Behaviour. — 2020. — Vol. 4. — No. 12. — P. 1303–1312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01009-0; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GOIRBP
84. Hodgson, D. The Consequences of Human Behavior / D. Hodgson // Humanities. — 2012. — Vol. 1. — No. 3. — P. 205–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/h1030205
85. Iacob, C. I. COVID-19 Pandemic Worry and Vaccination Intention: The Mediating Role of the Health Belief Model Components / C. I. Iacob, D. Ionescu, E. Avram [et al.] // Frontiers in Psychology. — 2021. — Vol. 12. — Article No. 674018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.674018
86. Islam, M. S. COVID-19–Related Infodemic and Its Impact on Public Health: A Global Social Media Analysis / M. S. Islam, T. Sarkar, S. H. Khan [et al.] // The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. — 2020. — Vol. 103. — No. 4. — P. 1621–1629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0812; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GYVGZQ
87. James, P. B. An assessment of Ebola-related stigma and its association with informal healthcare utilisation among Ebola survivors in Sierra Leone: a cross-sectional study / P. B. James, J. Wardle, A. Steel, [et al.] // BMC Public Health. — 2020. — Vol. 20. — Article No. 182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8279-7
88. Jamieson, K. H. The relation between media consumption and misinformation at the outset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the US / K. H. Jamieson, D. Albarracín // Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. — 2020. — Vol. 1. — Special Issue on COVID-19 and Misinformation.– URL: https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020–012 (retrieved on 03.07.2021) DOI: https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-012
89. Johansen, N. Surgical Strategy for Contralateral Groin Management in Patients Scheduled for Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair: An International Web-Based Surveymonkey® Questionnaire: Strategy for Contralateral Groin Management during Inguinal Hernia Repair / N. Johansen, M. Miserez, A. de Beaux [et al.] // Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. — 2021. — Vol. 110. — No. 3.– P. 368–372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1457496920938600; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EZECSA
90. Jolley, D. Prevention is better than cure: addressing anti-vaccine conspiracy theories / D. Jolley, K. M. Douglas // Journal of Applied Social Psychology. — 2017. — Vol. 47. — No. 2. — P. 459–469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12453
91. Jolley, D. The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions / D. Jolley, K. M. Douglas // PLoS One. — 2014. — No. 9. — Article No. e89177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089177
92. Jose, R. Public Perception and Preparedness for the Pandemic COVID-19: A Health Belief Model Approach / R. Jose, M. Narendran, A. Bindu [et al.] // Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. — 2021. — Vol. 9. — P. 41–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2020.06.009; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AENMTT
93. Kang, H. Source Cues in Online News: Is The Proximate Source More Powerful than Distal Sources? / H. Kang, K. Baek, S. Zhang, S. S. Sundar // Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. — 2011. — Vol. 88. — No. 4. — P. 719–736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800403
94. Kaplan, R. M. Influence of a COVID-19 Vaccine’s Effectiveness and Safety Profile on Vaccination Acceptance / R. M. Kaplan, A. Milstein. // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. — 2021. — Vol. 118. — No. 10. — Article No. e2021726118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021726118
95. Karlsson, M. You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet: Transparency’s (Lack of) Effect on Source and Message Credibility / M. Karlsson, C. Clerwall, L. Nord // Journalism Studies. — 2014. –Vol. 15. — No. 5. — P. 668–678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.886837
96. Kassa, S. M. Analysis of the mitigation strategies for COVID-19: From mathematical modelling perspective / S. M. Kassa, J. B. H. Njagarah, Y. Terefe. // Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. — 2020. — Vol. 138. — Article No. 109968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109968
97. Kehlbach, C. Corona-Demo in Berlin. Welche Bedingungen gelten für ein Verbot? / C. Kehlbach // Tagesschau. — 2020. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/faq-demonstration-verbot-101.html (retrieved on 15.10.2020).
98. Kempkens, O. H. Children in Times of a Pandemic — Do Parents More Frequently Believe in Rumors and Fake News on Social Media? / O. H. Kempkens // Communicology. — 2023. — Vol. 11. — No. 1. — P. 47–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2023-11-1-47-60; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TKQAPB
99. Kempkens, O. H. A critical attitude and its influence on behavior change in terms of forming a negative position towards governmental mitigation measures during a pandemic / O. H. Kempkens // Vestnik Universiteta. — 2023. — No. 7. — P. 220–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2023-7-220-232; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SMFHBN
100. Kempkens, O. H. Rumours and Fake News — Effects of Message Credibility on Human Behaviour during the Corona Pandemic / O. H. Kempkens // Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic Sciences. — 2022. — Vol. 7. — No. 2(24). — P. 162–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2022-7-2-162-170
101. Kempkens, O. H. On the Development of Resistance Against the Corona Policy of the German Government / O. H. Kempkens // Global Journal of Human-Social Science: F Political Science. — 2023. — Vol. 23 — No. 5. — P. 15–23.
102. Keren, F. What Explains Natives and Sojourners’ Preventive Health Behavior in a Pandemic: Role of Media and Scientific Self-Efficacy / F. Keren, A. N. Siddiquei, M. A. Anwar [et al.] // Frontiers in Psychology. — 2021. — Vol. 12. — Article No. 664399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.664399
103. Kim, J. An Examination of People’s Privacy Concerns, Perceptions of Social Benefits, and Acceptance of COVID-19 Mitigation Measures That Harness Location Information: A Comparative Study of the U.S. and South Korea / J. Kim, M. P. Kwan. // ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Informatics. — 2021. — Vol. 10. — No. 1. — P. 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10010025
104. Kissler, S. M. Projecting the Transmission Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 Through the Postpandemic Period / S. M. Kissler, C. Tedijanto, E. Goldstein, Y. H. Grad, M. Lipsitch // Science. — 2020. — Vol. 368. — No. 6493. — P. 860–868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb5793; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/INGICC
105. Klein, D. O. Fake news: a legal perspective / D. O. Klein, J. R. Wueller // Journal of Internet Law. — 2017. — Vol. 20. — No. 10. — P. 9.
106. Klofstad, C. A. What drives people to believe in Zika conspiracy theories? / C. A. Klofstad, J. E. Uscinski, J. M. Connolly [et al.] // Palgrave Communications. — 2019. — Vol. 5. — Article No. 36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0243-8
107. Kühne, R. The emotional foundations of fake news sharing on social media / R. Kühne, C. Schemer, J. Matthes, W. Wirth // Journal of Communication. — 2020. — Vol. 70. — No. 6. — P. 805–827.
108. Lazarus, J. V. A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine / J. V. Lazarus, S. C. Ratzan, A. Palayew, L. O. Gostin, H. J. Larson, K. Rabin, S. Kimball, A. El-Mohandes // Natural Medicine. — 2021. — No. 27. — P. 225–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1124-9
109. Lederer, E. M. U. N. Chief Antonio Guterres: Misinformation about COVID-19 Is the New Enemy / E. M. Lederer. — New York: NY TIME. — 2020 — Text: electronic. — URL: https://apnews.com/general-news-e829eddc01457c700d5541f2dc2beebc.
110. Leman, P. A major event has a major cause: evidence for the role of heuristics in reasoning about conspiracy theories / P. Leman, M. Cinnirella // Social Psychology Review. — 2007. — Vol. 9. — No. 2. — P. 18–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsspr.2007.9.2.18
111. Levy, N. The bad news about fake news / N. Levy // Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective. — 2017. — Vol. 6. — No. 8. — P. 20–36.
112. Lewandowsky, S. Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era / S. Lewandowsky, U. K. H. Ecker, J. Cook // Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. — 2017. — Vol. 6. — No. 4. — P. 353–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
113. Li, R. Factors influencing information credibility on social media platforms: evidence from Facebook pages / R. Li, A. Suh // Procedia Computer Science. — 2015. — Vol. 72. — P. 314 — 328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.146
114. Lunn, P. D. Using behavioural science to help fight the coronavirus / P. D. Lunn, C. Timmons, A. Julienne, C. Belton, R. Lavin, C. McGowan, L. Robertson // Journal of Behavioral Public Administration. — 2020. — Vol. 3. — No. 1. — P. 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.31.147
115. Luttrell, A. Making it Moral: Merely Labeling an Attitude as Moral Increases its Strength / A. Luttrell, R. Petty, P. Briñol, B. Wagner // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. — 2016. — Vol. 65. — P. 82–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.04.003
116. Marchlewska, M. In search of an imaginary enemy: Catholic collective narcissism and the endorsement of gender conspiracy beliefs / M. Marchlewska, A. Cichocka, F. Łozowski [et al.] // The Journal of Social Psychology. — 2019. — Vol. 159. — No. 6. — P. 766–779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2019.1586637
117. Mayer, R. E. Research-based principles for designing multimedia instruction / R. E. Mayer // Perspectives on Medical Education. — 2012. — Vol. 63. — No. 8. — P. 59–70.
118. McGuire, W. J. The effectiveness of supportive and refutational defenses in immunizing and restoring beliefs against persuasion / W. J. McGuire // Sociometry. — 1961. — Vol. 24. — No. 2. — P. 184–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2786067
119. Menni, C. Quantifying additional COVID-19 symptoms will save lives / C. Menni, C. H. Sudre, C. J. Steves, S. Ourselin, T. D. Spector // Correspondence. — 2020. — Vol. 395. — P. e107–e108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31281-2
120. Menczer, F., Information Overload Helps Fake News Spread, and Social Media Knows It / F. Menczer, T. Hills. — 2020. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/information-overload-helps-fake-news-spread-and-social-media-knows-it/ (retrieved on 15.07.2021).
121. Metzger, M. Credibility for the 21st Century: Integrating Perspectives on Source, Message, and Media Credibility in the Contemporary Media Environment / M. Metzger, A. J. Flanagin, K. Eyal, D. R. Lemus, & R. M. McCann // Communication Yearbook. — 2003. — Vol. 27. — P. 293–335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2003.11679029
122. Metzger, M. J. Psychological approaches to credibility assessment online / M. J. Metzger, A. J. Flanagin // The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology. — 2015. — P. 445–466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118426456.ch20
123. Miller, S. M. Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat / S. M. Miller // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. — 1987. — Vol. 52. — No. 2. — P. 345–353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.345
124. Milkman, K. L. A. Mega-Study of Text-Based Nudges Encouraging Patients to Get Vaccinated at an Upcoming Doctor’s Appointment / K. L. Milkman, M. S. Patel, L. Gandhi // Rotman School of Management Working Paper No. 3780267, Columbia Business School Research Paper Forthcoming, 2021. — 75 p.
125. Moser, D. A. Years of life lost due to the psychosocial consequences of COVID-19 mitigation strategies based on Swiss data / D. A. Moser, J. Glaus, S. Frangou [et al.] // European Psychiatry. — 2020. — Vol. 63. — No. 1. — Article No. e58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.56
126. Odriozola-Chéné, J. Towards quality journalism in Ecuador: perspectives of journalists and media consumers / J. Odriozola-Chéné, I. Mendizábal // Cuadernos.info. — 2017. — Vol. 41. — P. 175–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.41.1100
127. Oh, J. The effects of message framing and source credibility on fake news credibility perception / J. Oh, K. Lee // Journal of Public Relations Research. — 2019. — Vol. 31. — No. 5–6. — P. 162–176.
128. Oh, H. J. When Do People Verify and Share Health Rumors on Social Media? The Effects of Message Importance, Health Anxiety, and Health Literacy / H. J. Oh, H. Lee // Journal of Health Communication International Perspectives. — 2019. — Vol. 24. — No. 11. — P. 837–847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2019.1677824
129. Oh, O. Community intelligence and social media services: A rumor theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises / O. Oh, M. Agrawal, H. R. Rao // MIS Quarterly. — 2013. — Vol. 37. — No. 2. — P. 407–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.05
130. Oyeyemi, S. O. Ebola, Twitter, and misinformation: a dangerous combination? / S. O. Oyeyemi, E. Gabarron, R. Wynn // BMJ. — 2014. — Vol. 349. — Article No. g6178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g6178
131. Pennycook, G. The implied truth effect: Attaching warnings to a subset of fake news stories increases perceived accuracy of stories without warnings / G. Pennycook, D. G. Rand // Management Science. — 2019. — Vol. 66. — No. 11. — P. 4944–4957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3478
132. Pendleton, S. C. Rumor research revisited and expanded / S. C. Pendleton // Language & Communication. — 1998. — Vol. 18. — No. 1. — P. 69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(97)00024-4
133. Pentland, A. Modeling and Prediction of Human Behavior / A. Pentland, A. Liu // Neural Computation. — 1999. — Vol. 11. — No. 1. — P. 229–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/089976699300016890
134. Person, B. Fear and stigma: the epidemic within the SARS outbreak / B. Person, F. Sy, K. Holton, B. Govert, A. Liang, National Center for Infectious Diseases, SARS Community Outreach Team // Emerging Infectious Diseases. — 2004. — Vol. 10. — No. 2. – P. 358–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1002.030750
135. Ravens-Sieberer, U. Quality of life and mental health in children and adolescents during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: results of a two-wave nationwide population-based study / U. Ravens-Sieberer, A. Kaman, M. Erhart, C. Otto, J. Devine, C. Löffler, L. Hurrelmann, M. Bullinger, C. Barkmann, N. A. Siegel, A. M. Simon, L. H. Wieler, R. Schlack, H. Hölling // European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. — 2023. — Vol. 32. — No. 4. — P. 575–588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01889-1; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DQTZFE
136. Rieh, S. Y. Understanding Judgment of Information Quality and Cognitive Authority in the WWW / S. Y. Rieh, N. J. Belkin // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. — 1998. — Vol. 53. — No. 2. — P. 145–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10017
137. Rieh, S. Y. Credibility — A Multidisciplinary Framework / S. Y. Rieh, D. R. Danielson // Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. — 2007. — Vol. 41. — No. 1. — P. 307–364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410114
138. Rini, R. Fake news and partisan epistemology / R. Rini // Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. — 2017. — Vol. 27(2). — P. 43–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2017.0025
139. Robinson, S. Anyone Can Know’: Citizen Journalism and the Interpretive Community of the Mainstream Press / S. Robinson, C. DeShano // Journalism: Theory, Practice, Criticism. — 2011. — No. 12. — No. 8. — P. 963–982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911415973
140. Rosas, O. Public Engagement with, and Trust in, Online News Media in French-Speaking Belgium. / O. Rosas // Recherches en Communication. — 2013. — No. 40. — P. 169–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14428/rec.v40i40.49363
141. Rosenblueth, A. Behavior, Purpose and Teleology / A. Rosenblueth, N. Wiener, J. Bigelow // Philosophy of Science. — 1943. — Vol. 10. — No. 1. — P. 18–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/286788
142. Rosenthal, P. I. Specificity, verifiability, and message credibility / P. I. Rosenthal // Quarterly Journal of Speech. — 1971. — Vol. 57. — No. 1. — P. 393–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637109383084
143. Rucker, D. Consumer conviction and commitment: an appraisal-based framework for attitude certainty / D. Rucker, Z. L. Tormala, R. E. Petty, P. Briñol // Journal of Consumption Psychology. — 2014. — Vol. 24. — No. 1. — P. 119–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.07.001
144. Roozenbeek, J. Prebunking interventions based on “inoculation” theory can reduce susceptibility to misinformation across cultures / J. Roozenbeek, S. van der Linden, T. Nygren // Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. — 2020. — Vol. 1. — No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37016//mr-2020-008
145. Schweiger, W. Media Credibility — Experience or Image? A Survey on the Credibility of the World Wide Web in Germany in Comparison to Other Media / W. Schweiger // European Journal of Communication. — 2000. — Vol. 15. — No. 1. — P. 37–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323100015001002; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JRRXSF
146. Sharareh, N. The Ebola Crisis and the Corresponding Public Behavior: A System Dynamics Approach / N. Sharareh, N. S. Sabounchi, H. Sayama, [et al.] // PLoS Currents. — 2016. — Vol. 8. — P. 67–81.
147. Short, S. E. Social Determinants and Health Behaviors: Conceptual Frames and Empirical Advances / S. E. Short, S. Mollborn // Current Opinion on Psychology. — 2015. — Vol. 5. — P. 78–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.05.002
148. Sternisko, A. The dark side of social movements: Social identity, non-conformity, and the lure of conspiracy theories / A. Sternisko, A. Cichocka, J. J. Van Bavel // Current Opinion in Psychology. — 2020. — Vol. 35. — P. 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.02.007; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LMFEHW
149. Sundar, S. S. Effect of Source Attribution on Perception of Online News Stories / S. S. Sundar // Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. — 1998. — No. 75. — P. 55–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909807500108
150. Tandoc Jr., E. C. Defining “Fake news” / E. C. Tandoc, Z. W. Lim, R. Ling // Digital Journalism. — 2018. — Vol. 6. — No. 2 — P. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
151. Tandoc Jr., E. C. The Journalist is Marketing the News: Social Media in The Gatekeeping Process / E. Tandoc, T. P. Vos // Journalism Practice. — 2016. — Vol. 10 — No. 8. — P. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1087811
152. Tasnim, S. Impact of Rumors and Misinformation on COVID-19 in Social Media / S. Tasnim, M. M. Hossain, H. Mazumder // Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health. — 2020. — Vol. 53. — No. 3. — P. 171–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.20.094; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WJIXIO
153. Teven, J. An Examination of Perceived Credibility of the 2008 Presidential Candidates: Relationships with Believability, Likeability and Deceptiveness / J. Teven // Human Communications. — 2008. — Vol. 11. — P. 383–400.
154. Thorburn, B. S. Birth control conspiracy beliefs, perceived discrimination, and contraception among African Americans: an exploratory study / B. S. Thorburn, L. M. Bogart // Journal of Health Psychology. — 2003. — Vol. 8. — No. 2. — P. 263–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105303008002669
155. Thorson, E. Changing Patterns of News Consumption and Participation. Information, Communication and Society / E. Thorson // Information Communication and Society. — 2008. — Vol. 11. — No. 4. — P. 473–489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801999027
156. Tormala, Z. L. When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion / Z. L. Tormala, P. Briñol, R. E. Petty // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. — 2006. — Vol. 42. — No. 5. — P. 684–691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.10.005
157. Trevena, L. J. Current Challenges When Using Numbers in Patient Decision Aids: Advanced Concepts / L. J. Trevena, C. Bonner, Y. Okan [et al.] // Medical Decision Making. — 2021. — Vol. 41. — No. 7. — P. 834–847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x21996342; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BVWVWM
158. Tseng, H. The elements of computer credibility / H. Tseng, B. J. Fogg // Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’99. — Pittsburg: ACM Press, 1999. — P. 80–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/302979.303001
159. Umeogu, B. Source sredibility: A philosophical analysis / B. Umeogu // Open Journal of Philosophy. — 2012. — Vol. 2. — No. 2. — P. 112–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2012.22017
160. Van Bavel, J. National Identity Predicts Public Health Support During a Global Pandemic: Results from 67 Nations / J. Van Bavel, A. Cichocka, V. Capraro [et al.] // Nature Communications. — 2020. — Vol. 13. — No. 1. — Article No. 517.
161. Bavel, J.J.V. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response / J.J. V. Bavel, K. Baicker, P.S. Boggio, [et al.] // Natural Human Behavior. — 2020. — Vol. 4. — P. 460–471.
162. van Prooijen, J. W. Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations / J. W. van Prooijen, K. M. Douglas // Memory Studies. — 2018. — Vol. 11. — No. 4. — P. 423–436.
163. Vosoughi, S. The spread of true and false news online / S. Vosoughi, D. Roy, S. Aral // Science. — 2018. — Vol. 359. — No. 6380. — P. 1146–1151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
164. Wall, M. Citizen Journalism: A Retrospective on What We Know, An Agenda for What We Don’t / M. Wall // Digital Journalism. — 2015. — Vol. 3. — No. 6. — P. 797–813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.1002513
165. Walker, G. T. P. The impact of COVID-19 and strategies for mitigation and suppression in low- and middle-income countries / G. T. P. Walker, C. Whittaker, O. Watson // Science. — 2020. — Vol. 369. — No. 6502. — P. 413–422.
166. Wang, C. The Impact of COVID-19 on Anxiety in Chinese University Students / C. Wang, H. Zhao // Frontiers in Psychology. — 2020. — Vol. 11. — Article No. 1168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01168
167. Watts, W. A. Persistence of induced opinion change and retention of the inducing message contents / W. A. Watts, W. J. McGuire // The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. — 1964. — Vol. 68. — No. 3. — P. 233–241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041081
168. Wiener, J. L. Source Credibility: on the Independent Effects of Trust and Expertise / J. L. Wiener, J. C. Mowen // Advances in Consumer Research. — 1986. — Vol. 13. — P. 306–310.
169. Wu, K. False rumors detection on Sina Weibo by propagation structure / K. Wu, S. Yang, K. Q. Zhu // 2015 IEEE 31st International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). — Seoul: IEEE, 2015. — 1602 p. — P. 651–662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2015.7113322
170. Zannettou, S. The Web of False Information: Rumors, Fake News, Hoaxes, Clickbait, and Various Other Shenanigans / S. Zannettou, M. Sirivianos, J. Blackburn, N. Kourtellis // Journal of Data and Information Quality. — 2019. — Vol. 11. — No. 3. — Article No. 10. — P. 1–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3309699
171. Electronic Resources
172. Ärzteblatt. Wir sehen, dass die Kinder mit zunehmender Länge des Lockdowns immer mehr‚ am Rad drehen. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrichten/120837/Wir-sehen-dass-die-Kinder-mit-zunehmender-Laenge-des-Lockdowns-immer-mehr-am-Rad-drehen (retrieved on 09.07.2021).
173. Buchholz, K. Global Vaccine Timeline Stretches to 2023. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.statista.com/chart/24064/covid-19-vaccination-timeline-global/ (retrieved on 09.07.2021).
174. Bundesregierung (ed.). Coronavirus: Wo stehen wir in der Pandemie und wie handeln wir? — Text: electronic.– URL: https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/themen/coronavirus (retrieved on 07.07.2021).
175. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (ed.). Zum gesellschaftlichen Umgang mit der Corona-Pandemie. Ergebnisse der Mannheimer Corona-Studie. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://m.bpb.de/apuz/314345/zum-gesellschaftlichen-umgang-mit-der-corona-pandemie (retrieved on 09.07.2021).
176. CDC (ed.). SARS-CoV-2 Variant Classifications and Definitions — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/variant-info.html (retrieved on 21.06.2021).
177. CDC (ed.). Implementation of Mitigation Strategies for Communities with Local COVID-19 Transmission. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/community-mitigation.html (retrieved on 08.07.2021).
178. Cement, J. Number of global social network users 2017–2025. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/ (retrieved on 15.10.2020).
179. Center for Preparedness and Response. Responding to Rumors and Misinformation-Emergency Preparedness and Response. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7853571/pdf/20-3139.pdf (retrieved on 15.10.2020).
180. Dai, H. Behavioral Nudges Increase COVID-19 Vaccinations, Preprint at SSRN. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3817832 (retrieved on 19.07.2021).
181. DESTATIS. Bevölkerungsstand — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Bevoelkerungsstand/_inhalt.html (retrieved on 20.10.2020).
182. ECDC. Infographic: Mutation of SARS-CoV-2 — current variants of concern. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/covid-19-infographic-mutations-current-variants-concern (retrieved on 21.04.2021).
183. Ellis, E. G. The coronavirus outbreak is a petri dish for conspiracy theories / E. G. Ellis. — 2020. — Text : electronic. — URL: https://www.wired.com/story/coronavirus-conspiracy-theories/ (retrieved on 13.07.2021).
184. Engels, B. Corona: Stresstest für die Digitalisierung in Deutschland / B. Engels // IW-Kurzbericht. — 2020. — Vol. 23. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.iwkoeln.de/studien/barbara-engels-stresstest-fuer-die- digitalisierung-in-deutschland-463744.html
185. Financial Times (ed.). Lockdowns compared: tracking governments’ coronavirus responses. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://ig.ft.com/coronavirus-lockdowns/ (retrieved on 08.07.2021).
186. Frenkel, S. Surge of virus misinformation stumps Facebook and Twitter / S. Frenkel, D. Alba, R. Zhong // The New York Times. — 2020. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/08/technology/coronavirus-misinformation-social-media.html (retrieved on 13.07.2021).
187. Gottfried, J. News Use Across Social Media Platforms / J. Gottfried, E. Shearer. — Pew Research Center. — 2016. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/ (retrieved on 20.10.2020).
188. Kamplean, A. Influence of emotion on fake news sharing behavior: The case study from Thailand / A. Kamplean // ITS Online Event. — 2020. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/224861/1/Kamplean.pdf.
189. Klaus, J. Internationale Studie — Wie Fakenews über Corona den Menschen schaden / J. Klaus // Bundesverband Deutscher Stiftungen. — 2020. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/digitales/coronavirus-fakenews-studie-infodemie-100.html (retrieved on 06.07.2021).
190. Macmillan Dictionary (ed.). Credibility. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/credibility (retrieved on 21.06.2021).
191. Menczer, F. Information Overload Helps Fake News Spread, and Social Media Knows It / F. Menczer, T. Hills // Scientific American. — 2020. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/information-overload-helps-fake-news-spread-and-social-media-knows-it/ (retrieved on 15.07.2021).
192. MIT Media Lab. The Spread of True and False Information Online. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/the-spread-of-false-and-true-info-online/frequently-asked-questions/#faq-what-does-this-research-tell-us-about-human-behavior (retrieved on 15.07.2021).
193. National Institutes of Health (NIH). Social and Behavioral Theories. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://%3A%2F%2Fobssr.od.nih.gov%2Fsites%2Fobssr%2Ffiles%2FSocial-and-Behavioral-Theories.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2Ittguew3qt0po6IEx2CYM&opi=89978449 (retrieved on 04.03.2024).
194. Oremus, W. Stop Calling Everything Fake News / W. Oremus // Slate. — 2016. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2016/12/stop_calling_everything_fake_news.html (retrieved on 15.10.2020).
195. Resnick, P. RumorLens: A System for Analyzing the Impact of Rumors and Corrections in Social Media / P. Resnick, S. Carton, S. Park, Y. Shen, N. Zeffer // Computer Science. — 2017. — URL: http://scarton.people.si.umich.edu/files/papers/Resnick%20et%20al.%20-%202014%20-%20RumorLens%20A%20System%20for%20Analyzing%20the%20Impact%20of%20Ru.pdf (retrieved on 03.07.2021).
196. Statista. Number of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) deaths worldwide as of July 5, 2021, by country. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1093256/novel-coronavirus-2019ncov-deaths-worldwide-by-country/ (retrieved on 07.07.2021).
197. Statista. Number of coronavirus (COVID-19) deaths in Germany in 2021, by gender and age. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1105512/coronavirus-covid-19-deaths-by-gender-germany/ (retrieved on 07.07.2021).
198. Statista. Most likely perceived cause of food and supply shortages in local grocery stores due to coronavirus (COVID-19) in the United States as of March 15, 2020. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1105594/coronavirus-cause-grocery-store-food-and-supply-shortages-us/ (retrieved on 11.07.2021).
199. Statista. Fühlen Sie sich durch die Corona-Maßnahmen persönlich stark eingeschränkt? (Zustimmung nach Parteianhängerschaft). — Text: electronic. — URL: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/1140101/umfrage/corona-krise-einschraenkungen-durch-massnahmen/ (retrieved on 24.09.2020).
200. Statista. Number of social network users worldwide from 2017 to 2025. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/ (retrieved on 15.10.2020).
201. Statista. Age and Gender Structure in Germany. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1086197/men-and-women-by-age-group-germany/ (retrieved on 29.12.2021).
202. Tagesschau. Corona-Demo in Berlin — Welche Bedingungen gelten für ein Verbot? — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/faq-demonstration-verbot-101.html (retrieved on 28.08.2020).
203. WHO. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200710-covid-19-sitrep-172.pdf. (retrieved on 13.07.2021).
204. WHO. Home Care for Patients with COVID-19 Presenting with Mild Symptoms and Management of Their Contacts. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.who.int/publications-detail/home-care-for-patients-with-suspected-novel-coronavirus-(ncov)-infection-presenting-with-mild-symptoms-and-management-of-contacts (retrieved on 16.07.2021).
205. WHO. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Advice for the Public: Mythbusters. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/myth-busters (retrieved on 16.07.2021).
206. WHO. Ebola Virus Disease — Democratic Republic of the Congo. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.who.int/csr/don/28-november-2019-ebola-drc/en/. (retrieved on 06.07.2021).
207. World Economic Forum. Key milestones in the spread of the coronavirus pandemic — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/ 2020/04/coronavirus-spread-covid19-pandemic-timeline-milestones/ (retrieved on 15.12.2021).
208. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020 Framework. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://wayback.archive-it.org/5774/20220413182850/https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/ (retrieved on 09.12.2020)
