Монография посвящена исследованию воздействия дезинформации на общественное поведение в период пандемии COVID-19. Основная цель исследования — проанализировать, как слухи и фейковые новости, распространяемые в социальных сетях, влияли на поведение общества, соблюдение санитарных мер и доверие к государственным институтам. В исследовании разработана теоретическая основа, определены ключевые понятия, такие как слухи, фейковые новости, достоверность и поведение людей в условиях кризиса. Рассмотрено развитие дезинформации в период пандемии на примере Германии, анализируются реакции различных демографических групп на слухи, дезинформацию и меры, принимаемые правительством для борьбы с пандемией. Был применён смешанный метод исследований с преобладанием количественного анализа, основанного на онлайн-опросе, проведённом в период с января по июнь 2021 года. В исследовании изучается степень влияния достоверности сообщений, личных качеств и медиапотребления на такие аспекты поведения, как соблюдение карантинных мер, вера в теории заговора и отношение к вакцинации. Основные выводы показывают, что люди с низким доверием к властям и высоким уровнем тревожности относительно вируса были более восприимчивы к дезинформации. Монография вносит вклад в область коммуникации в здравоохранении, предлагая рекомендации по управлению слухами и дезинформацией во время кризисов. Особое внимание уделяется важности прозрачности и детализированности сообщений от доверенных источников. Исследование также предлагает политические рекомендации по улучшению кризисной коммуникации и регулированию социальных сетей.
пандемия коронавируса, COVID-19, слухи, фейковые новости, поведение человека, сопротивление, ограничения, критическое отношение, меры по смягчению последствий, социальные сети
1. Aaronovitch, D. Voodoo Histories: The Role of the Conspiracy Theory in Shaping Modern History. — London: Jonathan Cape, 2009. — 400 P.
2. Alexander, J. E. How to Evaluate and Create Information Quality on the Web. — New York: L. Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1999. — 148 p.
3. Allport, G. W. The psychology of rumour. — New York: Henry Holt & Co,
4. — 247 p.
5. Aphiwongsophon, S. Detecting Fake News with Machine Learning Method. — Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University, 2018. — 531 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTICon.2018.8620051
6. Artifical Intelligence for Human Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science / Ed. by T. S. Hunag, A. Nijholt, M. Pantic, A. Pentland. — Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Netherlands, 2007. — P. 47–71.
7. Atteslander, P. Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. — Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag, 2006. — 345 s.
8. Berger-Grabner, D. Angewandte qualitative Sozialforschung: Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten in den Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften. — Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler, 2016. — 260 p.
9. Bergmann, J. R. Discreet indiscretions: The social organization of gossip. — New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1993. — 206 p.
10. Björn, R. Quantitative Methoden 2: Einführung in die Statistik für Psychologen und Sozialwissenschaftler. — Berlin: Springer, 2014. — 165 p.
11. Bortz, J., Döring, N. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation: Qualitative und Quantitative Methoden. — Berlin: Springer, 2002. — 783 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07299-8
12. Burzan, N. Quantitative Methoden kompakt. — München: UVK Verlag, 2015. — 174 s. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838537658
13. Eastin, M. S. Digital media, youth and credibility. — London: MIT Press, 2008. — 202 P.
14. Georgeou, N. State Responses to COVID-19: a global snapshot at 1 June 2020 — Sydney: HADRI / Western Sydney University, 2020. — 136 p.
15. Gupta, M. Proceedings of the 12th SIAM International Conference on Data Mining / M. Gupta, P. Zhao, J. Han // Anaheim: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Publications, 2012. — 1150 p. — P. 153–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611972825.14
16. Honigsbaum, M. A history of the great influenza pandemics: death, panic and hysteria, 1830–1920. — London: I. B. Tauris, 2013. — 320 p.
17. Jones, M. Fake: The art of deception. — London: The British Museum, 1990. — 312 p. — P. 11–16.
18. Kelle, U. Empirische Forschungsmethoden. Lehrer-Schüler-Interaktion.– Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2008. — 63 s.
19. McCroskey, J. C. An introduction to rhetorical communication. — London: Allyn and Bacon, 1997. — 307 p.
20. Lilleker, D. G. Evidence to the Culture, Media and Sport Committee ‘Fake news’ inquiry presented by the Faculty for Media & Communication. — Bournemouth: Bournemouth University, 2017. — 6 p.
21. Liu, F. Rumors on social media in disasters: extending transmission to retransmission / F. Liu, A. Burton-Jones, D. Xu // Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS). — Kaohsiung: National Sun Yat-sen University, 2014.– 389 p.
22. Pantic, M. Human Computing and Machine Understanding of Human Behavior : A Survey. Artifical Intelligence for Human Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. — Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2007. — 71 p.
23. Plotnick, L. Real or Fake? User Behavior and Attitudes Related to Determining the Veracity of Social Media Posts / L. Plotnick, S. R. Hiltz, S. Grandhi [et al.] // Proceedings of the ISCRAM Asia-Pacific Conference 2018 / Ed. by K. Stock, D. Bunker. — Wellington: Massey University, 2019. — P. 439–449.
24. Riescher, G. Theorien der Vergleichenden Regierungslehre: Eine Einführung / G. Riescher, M. Obrecht, T. Haas. — München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, 2011. — 134 s. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/9783486714302
25. Rosenstock, I. M. Health Belief Model / I. M. Rosenstock // Encyclopedia of Psychology : [in 8 volumes]. Vol. 4. / Ed. by A. E. Kazdin. — London: Oxford University Press, 2000. — 546 p.
26. Skinner, B. F. Science and Human Behavior / B. F. Skinner — Cambridge: The B. F. Skinner Foundation, 1965. — 461 P.
27. Information technology and moral philosophy / Ed. by J. v. d. Hoven, J. Weckert. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. — 428 p.
28. Walter, H. Forschungsmethoden in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften für Bachelor. — Berlin: Springer, 2013. — 333 s.
29. Weiner, B. An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion. — New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986. — 304 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1
30. Weiss, R. The Provisions of Social Relationships. Doing unto Others. — Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1974. — P. 176.
31. Wierzbicki, A. Polish-Belarusian relations. Between a common past and the future / A. Wierzbicki. — Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2018. — 207 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845291147
32. Wierzbicki, A. Web Content Credibility. — Berlin: Springer, 2018. — 233 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77794-8
33. Zhao, Z. Enquiring minds: early detection of rumors in social media from enquiry posts / Z. Zhao, P. Resnic, Q. Mei // Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web WWW ’15. — Florence: International World Wild Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2015. — 1561 p. — P. 1395–1405.
34. Articles
35. Abu-Akel, A. The effect of spokesperson attribution on public health message sharing during the COVID-19 pandemic / A. Abu-Akel, A. Spitz, R. West // PLoS ONE. — 2021. — Vol. 16. — No. 2. — Article e0245100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245100; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LMUKXT
36. Akseer, N. COVID-19 Pandemic and Mitigation Strategies: Implications for Maternal and Child Health and Nutrition / N. Akseer, G. Kandru, E. C. Keats, Z. A. Bhutta // American Journal for Clinical Nutrition. — 2020. — No.112. — P. 251–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa171; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/POFFTI
37. Alkhodair, S. Detecting breaking news rumors of emerging topics in social media / S. Alkhodair, S. Ding, B. Fung, J. Liu // Information Processing & Management. — 2019. — Vol. 57. — No. 2. — Article 102018. — P. 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.02.016
38. Appelman, A. Measuring message credibility: Construction and validation of an exclusive scale / A. Appelman, S. S. Sundar // Journal of Communication. — 2016. — Vol. 66. — No. 1. — P. 59–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015606057
39. Arafat, S. Psychological underpinning of panic buying during pandemic (COVID-19) / S. M. Arafat, S. K. Kar, M. Marthoenis, P. Sharma, E. H. Apu, R. Kabir // Psychiatry Research. — 2020. — Vol. 289. — Article No. 113061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113061
40. Aschwanden, A. A roadmap towards credible projections of ice sheet contribution to sea level / A. Aschwanden, T. C. Bartholomaus, D. J. Brinkerhoff, M. Truffer // The Cryosphere. — 2020. — Vol. 15. — No. 12. — P. 5705–5715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5705-2021
41. Baek, Y. M. Fake News Should Be Regulated Because It Influences Both “Others” and “Me”: How and Why the Influence of Presumed Influence Model Should Be Extended / Y. M. Baek, H. Kang, S. Kim // Mass Communication and Society. — 2019 — Vol. 22. — No. 3. — P. 301–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1562076
42. Bakir, V. Fake news and the economy of emotions: problems, causes, solutions / V. Bakir, A. McStay // Digital Journalism. — 2018. — Vol. 6. — No. 2. — P. 154–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1345645
43. Banas, J. A. A meta-analysis of research on inoculation theory / J. A. Banas, S. A. Rains // Communication Monographs. — 2010. — Vol. 77. — No. 3. — P. 281–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751003758193
44. Baral, S. Leveraging Epidemiological Principles to Evaluate Sweden’s COVID-19 Response / S. Baral, R. Chandler, R. G. Prieto [et al.] // Annals of epidemiology. — 2021. — Vol. 54. — P. 21–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.11.005; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SRGDBY
45. Basol, M. Good news about bad news: gamified inoculation boosts confidence and cognitive immunity against fake news / M. Basol, J. Roozenbeek, S. van der Linden // Journal of Cognition. — 2020. — Vol. 3. — No. 1. — Article No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.91
46. Bastick, Z. Would You Notice if Fake News Changed Your Behavior? An Experiment on the Unconscious Effects of Disinformation / Z. Bastick // Computers in Human Behavior. — 2021. — Vol. 116. — Article No. 106633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106633
47. Bateman, C. Paying the price for AIDS denialism / C. Bateman // South African Medical Journal. — 2007. — Vol. 97. — No. 10. — P. 912–914.
48. Bish, A. Demographic and Attitudinal Determinants of Protective Behaviors During a Pandemic: A Review / A. Bish, S. Michie // British Journal of Health Psychology. — 2010. — Vol. 15. — No. 4. — P. 797–824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/135910710X485826
49. Bode, L. See something, say something: Correction of global health misinformation on social media / L. Bode, E. K. Vraga // Health Communication. — 2018. — Vol. 33. — No. 9. — P. 1131–1140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1331312
50. Boehm, L. E. The validity effect: A search for mediating variables / L. E. Boehm // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. — 1994. — Vol. 20. — No. 3. — P. 285 — 293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294203006; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JPAMTT
51. Brotherton, R. Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: the generic conspiracist beliefs scale / R. Brotherton, C. C. French, A. D. Pickering // Frontiers of Psychology. — 2013. — Vol. 4. — Article No. 279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279
52. Bruine de Bruin, W. Decision-Making Competence: More Than Intelligence? / W. Bruine de Bruin, A. M. Parker, B. Fischhoff // Current Directions in Psychological Science. — 2020. — Vol. 29. — No. 2. — P. 186–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420901592; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TICWEO
53. Bryanov K. Determinants of individuals’ belief in fake news: A scoping review determinants of belief in fake news / K. Bryanov, V. Vziatysheva // PLoS One. — 2021. — Vol. 16. — No. 6. — Article No. e0253717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253717
54. Buchanan, T. Why Do People Spread False Information Online? The Effects of Message and Viewer Characteristics on Self-Reported Likelihood of Sharing Social Media Disinformation / T. Buchanan // PLOS One. — 2020. — Vol. 15. — No. 10. — Article No. e0239666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239666
55. Champion, V. L. The Health Belief Model / V. L. Champion, C. S. Skinner // Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, research, and practice / Ed. by K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, K. Viswanath. — San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2008. — P. 45–65.
56. Cherian, V. Assessment of timely immunization in an urbanized agglomeration of East Delhi, India / V. Cherian, N. K. Saini, A. K. Sharma // International Journal of Community Medical Public Health. — 2019. — Vol. 6. — No. 3. — P. 1156–1161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20190603
57. Cinelli, M. The COVID-19 Social Media Infodemic / M. Cinelli, W. Quattrociocchi, A. Galeazzi [et al.] // Scientific Reports. — 2020. — Vol. 10. — No. 1. — Article No. 16598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5
58. Cinelli, M. The echo chamber effect on social media. / M. Cinelli, G. D. F. Morales, A. Galeazzi [et al.] // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. — 2021. — Vol. 118. — No. 9. — Article No. e2023301118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
59. Clayton, K. Real solutions for fake news? Measuring the effectiveness of general warnings and fact-check tags in reducing belief in false stories on social media / K. Clayton, S. Blair, J. A. Busam [et al.] // Political Behavior. — 2020. — Vol. 42. — No. 4. — P. 1073–1095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09533-0; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BTRRWQ
60. Clement, J. Number of global social network user (2017–2025) / J. Clement. — 2020. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/ (retrieved on 30.09.2020).
61. Clinton, J. Partisan pandemic: How partisanship and public health concerns affect individuals’ social mobility during COVID-19 / J. Clinton, J. Cohen, J. Lapinski [et al.] // Science Advances. — 2021. — Vol. 7. — No. 2. — Article No. eabd7204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd7204; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VGIFPZ
62. Colizzi, M. Medically unexplained symptoms in the times of COVID-19 pandemic: A case-report / M. Colizzi, R. Bortoletto, M. Silvestri, F. Mondini, E. Puttini, C. Cainelli, R. Gaudino, M. Ruggeri, L. Zoccante // Brain, Behavior, & Immunity — Health. — 2020. — Vol. 5. — Article No. 100073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbih.2020.100073
63. Cristea, I. A. Increase value and reduce waste in research on psychological therapies / I. A. Cristea, F. Naudet // Behaviour research and therapy. — 2019. — Vol. 123. — Article No. 103479 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.103479
64. Dahlgren, G. What Can We Do About Inequalities in Health? / G. Dahlgren, M. Whitehead // Lancet. — 1991. — Vol. 338. — No. 8774. — P. 1059–1063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(91)91911-D
65. De Ceukelaire, W. We need strong public health care to contain the global Corona pandemic / W. De Ceukelaire, C. Bodini // International Journal of Health Services. — 2020. — Vol. 50. — No. 3. — P. 276–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020731420916725; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LWKOZX
66. Dentith, M. R. X. The Problem of Fake News / M. R. X. Dentith // Public Reason. — 2016. — Vol. 8. — No. 1–2. — P. 65–79.
67. Dias, N. Emphasizing publishers does not effectively reduce susceptibility to misinformation on social media / N. Dias, G. Pennycook // Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. — 2020. — Vol. 1. — No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-001
68. Difonzo, N. Reining in rumors / N. Difonzo, P. Bordia, R. L. Rosnow // Organizational Dynamics. — 1994. — Vol. 23. — No. 1. — P. 47–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(94)90087-6
69. Douglas, K. M. The psychology of conspiracy theories / K. M. Douglas, R. M. Sutton, A. Cichocka // Current Directions in Psychology Science. — 2017. — Vol. 26. — No. 6. — P. 538–542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261
70. Eastin, M. S. Extending the digital divide conversation: Examining the knowledge gap through media expectancies / M. S. Eastin, V. Cicchirillo, A. Mabry // Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media. — 2018. — Vol. 62. — No. 3. — P. 379–395.
71. Ebrahim, S. H. Covid-19 and community mitigation strategies in a pandemic / S. H. Ebrahim, Q. A. Ahmed, E. Gozzer, P. Schlagenhauf, Z. A. Memish // BMJ. — 2020. — Vol. 368 — Article No. m1066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1066
72. Eisend, M. Source Credibility Dimensions in Marketing Communication: A Generalized Solution / M. Eisend // Journal of Empirical Generalizations in Marketing Science. — 2006. — Vol. 10. — No. 2. — P. 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15358/0344-1369-2006-JRM-1-43
73. Engels, R. The social construction of crisis: Media narratives and public perception during pandemics / R. Engels // Mass Communication and Society. — 2021. — Vol. 24. — No. 2. — P. 235–257.
74. Foy, J. E. Would a madman have been so wise as this? The effects of source credibility and message credibility on validation / J. E. Foy, P. C. LoCasto, S. W. Briner, S. Dyar // Memory & Cognition. — 2017. — Vol. 45. — P. 281–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0656-1
75. Gentili, C. Challenges and Opportunities for Human Behavior Research in the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic / C. Gentili, I. A. Cristea // Frontiers in Psychology. — 2020. — Vol. 11. — Article No. 1786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01786
76. Gelfert, A. Fake News — A Definition. / A. Gelfert // Informal Logic. — 2018. — Vol. 38. — No. 1. — P. 84–117 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v38i1.5068
77. Goldman, A. I. The social epistemology of blogging / A. I. Goldman // Information Technology and Moral Philosophy / Ed. by J. v. d. Hoven, J. Weckert. — Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press, 2008. — P. 111–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498725.007
78. Gollwitzer, A. Partisan Differences in Physical Distancing are Linked to Health Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic / A. Gollwitzer, C. Martel, W. J. Brady // Nature Human Behaviour. — 2020. — Vol. 4. — No. 11. — P. 1186–1197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00977-7; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LAIOGF
79. Graeupner, D. The dark side of meaning-making: how social exclusion leads to superstitious thinking / D. Graeupner, A. Coman // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. — 2017. — Vol. 69. — P. 218–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.003
80. Greene, C. M. Quantifying the Effects of Fake News on Behavior: Evidence from a Study of COVID-19 Misinformation / C. M. Greene, G. Murphy // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. — 2021. — Vol. 27. — No. 4. — P. 773–784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000371; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DQJVXC
81. Greyling, C. Lessons from the Faith-Driven Response to the West Africa Ebola Epidemic / C. Greyling, J. A. Maulit, S. Parry [et al.] // The Review of Faith & International Affairs. — 2016. — Vol. 14. — No. 3. — P. 118–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2016.1215829
82. Guess, A. Does counter-attitudinal information cause backlash? Results from three large survey experiments / A. Guess, A. Coppock // British Journal of Political Science. — 2018. — Vol. 50. — No. 4. — P. 1497–1515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000327
83. Haug, N. Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions / N. Haug, L. Geyrhofer, A. Londei [et al.] // Nature Human Behaviour. — 2020. — Vol. 4. — No. 12. — P. 1303–1312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01009-0; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GOIRBP
84. Hodgson, D. The Consequences of Human Behavior / D. Hodgson // Humanities. — 2012. — Vol. 1. — No. 3. — P. 205–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/h1030205
85. Iacob, C. I. COVID-19 Pandemic Worry and Vaccination Intention: The Mediating Role of the Health Belief Model Components / C. I. Iacob, D. Ionescu, E. Avram [et al.] // Frontiers in Psychology. — 2021. — Vol. 12. — Article No. 674018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.674018
86. Islam, M. S. COVID-19–Related Infodemic and Its Impact on Public Health: A Global Social Media Analysis / M. S. Islam, T. Sarkar, S. H. Khan [et al.] // The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. — 2020. — Vol. 103. — No. 4. — P. 1621–1629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0812; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GYVGZQ
87. James, P. B. An assessment of Ebola-related stigma and its association with informal healthcare utilisation among Ebola survivors in Sierra Leone: a cross-sectional study / P. B. James, J. Wardle, A. Steel, [et al.] // BMC Public Health. — 2020. — Vol. 20. — Article No. 182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8279-7
88. Jamieson, K. H. The relation between media consumption and misinformation at the outset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the US / K. H. Jamieson, D. Albarracín // Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. — 2020. — Vol. 1. — Special Issue on COVID-19 and Misinformation.– URL: https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020–012 (retrieved on 03.07.2021) DOI: https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-012
89. Johansen, N. Surgical Strategy for Contralateral Groin Management in Patients Scheduled for Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair: An International Web-Based Surveymonkey® Questionnaire: Strategy for Contralateral Groin Management during Inguinal Hernia Repair / N. Johansen, M. Miserez, A. de Beaux [et al.] // Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. — 2021. — Vol. 110. — No. 3.– P. 368–372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1457496920938600; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EZECSA
90. Jolley, D. Prevention is better than cure: addressing anti-vaccine conspiracy theories / D. Jolley, K. M. Douglas // Journal of Applied Social Psychology. — 2017. — Vol. 47. — No. 2. — P. 459–469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12453
91. Jolley, D. The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions / D. Jolley, K. M. Douglas // PLoS One. — 2014. — No. 9. — Article No. e89177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089177
92. Jose, R. Public Perception and Preparedness for the Pandemic COVID-19: A Health Belief Model Approach / R. Jose, M. Narendran, A. Bindu [et al.] // Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. — 2021. — Vol. 9. — P. 41–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2020.06.009; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AENMTT
93. Kang, H. Source Cues in Online News: Is The Proximate Source More Powerful than Distal Sources? / H. Kang, K. Baek, S. Zhang, S. S. Sundar // Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. — 2011. — Vol. 88. — No. 4. — P. 719–736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800403
94. Kaplan, R. M. Influence of a COVID-19 Vaccine’s Effectiveness and Safety Profile on Vaccination Acceptance / R. M. Kaplan, A. Milstein. // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. — 2021. — Vol. 118. — No. 10. — Article No. e2021726118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021726118
95. Karlsson, M. You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet: Transparency’s (Lack of) Effect on Source and Message Credibility / M. Karlsson, C. Clerwall, L. Nord // Journalism Studies. — 2014. –Vol. 15. — No. 5. — P. 668–678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.886837
96. Kassa, S. M. Analysis of the mitigation strategies for COVID-19: From mathematical modelling perspective / S. M. Kassa, J. B. H. Njagarah, Y. Terefe. // Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. — 2020. — Vol. 138. — Article No. 109968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109968
97. Kehlbach, C. Corona-Demo in Berlin. Welche Bedingungen gelten für ein Verbot? / C. Kehlbach // Tagesschau. — 2020. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/faq-demonstration-verbot-101.html (retrieved on 15.10.2020).
98. Kempkens, O. H. Children in Times of a Pandemic — Do Parents More Frequently Believe in Rumors and Fake News on Social Media? / O. H. Kempkens // Communicology. — 2023. — Vol. 11. — No. 1. — P. 47–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2023-11-1-47-60; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TKQAPB
99. Kempkens, O. H. A critical attitude and its influence on behavior change in terms of forming a negative position towards governmental mitigation measures during a pandemic / O. H. Kempkens // Vestnik Universiteta. — 2023. — No. 7. — P. 220–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2023-7-220-232; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SMFHBN
100. Kempkens, O. H. Rumours and Fake News — Effects of Message Credibility on Human Behaviour during the Corona Pandemic / O. H. Kempkens // Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic Sciences. — 2022. — Vol. 7. — No. 2(24). — P. 162–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2022-7-2-162-170
101. Kempkens, O. H. On the Development of Resistance Against the Corona Policy of the German Government / O. H. Kempkens // Global Journal of Human-Social Science: F Political Science. — 2023. — Vol. 23 — No. 5. — P. 15–23.
102. Keren, F. What Explains Natives and Sojourners’ Preventive Health Behavior in a Pandemic: Role of Media and Scientific Self-Efficacy / F. Keren, A. N. Siddiquei, M. A. Anwar [et al.] // Frontiers in Psychology. — 2021. — Vol. 12. — Article No. 664399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.664399
103. Kim, J. An Examination of People’s Privacy Concerns, Perceptions of Social Benefits, and Acceptance of COVID-19 Mitigation Measures That Harness Location Information: A Comparative Study of the U.S. and South Korea / J. Kim, M. P. Kwan. // ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Informatics. — 2021. — Vol. 10. — No. 1. — P. 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10010025
104. Kissler, S. M. Projecting the Transmission Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 Through the Postpandemic Period / S. M. Kissler, C. Tedijanto, E. Goldstein, Y. H. Grad, M. Lipsitch // Science. — 2020. — Vol. 368. — No. 6493. — P. 860–868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb5793; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/INGICC
105. Klein, D. O. Fake news: a legal perspective / D. O. Klein, J. R. Wueller // Journal of Internet Law. — 2017. — Vol. 20. — No. 10. — P. 9.
106. Klofstad, C. A. What drives people to believe in Zika conspiracy theories? / C. A. Klofstad, J. E. Uscinski, J. M. Connolly [et al.] // Palgrave Communications. — 2019. — Vol. 5. — Article No. 36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0243-8
107. Kühne, R. The emotional foundations of fake news sharing on social media / R. Kühne, C. Schemer, J. Matthes, W. Wirth // Journal of Communication. — 2020. — Vol. 70. — No. 6. — P. 805–827.
108. Lazarus, J. V. A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine / J. V. Lazarus, S. C. Ratzan, A. Palayew, L. O. Gostin, H. J. Larson, K. Rabin, S. Kimball, A. El-Mohandes // Natural Medicine. — 2021. — No. 27. — P. 225–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1124-9
109. Lederer, E. M. U. N. Chief Antonio Guterres: Misinformation about COVID-19 Is the New Enemy / E. M. Lederer. — New York: NY TIME. — 2020 — Text: electronic. — URL: https://apnews.com/general-news-e829eddc01457c700d5541f2dc2beebc.
110. Leman, P. A major event has a major cause: evidence for the role of heuristics in reasoning about conspiracy theories / P. Leman, M. Cinnirella // Social Psychology Review. — 2007. — Vol. 9. — No. 2. — P. 18–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsspr.2007.9.2.18
111. Levy, N. The bad news about fake news / N. Levy // Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective. — 2017. — Vol. 6. — No. 8. — P. 20–36.
112. Lewandowsky, S. Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era / S. Lewandowsky, U. K. H. Ecker, J. Cook // Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. — 2017. — Vol. 6. — No. 4. — P. 353–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
113. Li, R. Factors influencing information credibility on social media platforms: evidence from Facebook pages / R. Li, A. Suh // Procedia Computer Science. — 2015. — Vol. 72. — P. 314 — 328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.146
114. Lunn, P. D. Using behavioural science to help fight the coronavirus / P. D. Lunn, C. Timmons, A. Julienne, C. Belton, R. Lavin, C. McGowan, L. Robertson // Journal of Behavioral Public Administration. — 2020. — Vol. 3. — No. 1. — P. 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.31.147
115. Luttrell, A. Making it Moral: Merely Labeling an Attitude as Moral Increases its Strength / A. Luttrell, R. Petty, P. Briñol, B. Wagner // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. — 2016. — Vol. 65. — P. 82–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.04.003
116. Marchlewska, M. In search of an imaginary enemy: Catholic collective narcissism and the endorsement of gender conspiracy beliefs / M. Marchlewska, A. Cichocka, F. Łozowski [et al.] // The Journal of Social Psychology. — 2019. — Vol. 159. — No. 6. — P. 766–779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2019.1586637
117. Mayer, R. E. Research-based principles for designing multimedia instruction / R. E. Mayer // Perspectives on Medical Education. — 2012. — Vol. 63. — No. 8. — P. 59–70.
118. McGuire, W. J. The effectiveness of supportive and refutational defenses in immunizing and restoring beliefs against persuasion / W. J. McGuire // Sociometry. — 1961. — Vol. 24. — No. 2. — P. 184–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2786067
119. Menni, C. Quantifying additional COVID-19 symptoms will save lives / C. Menni, C. H. Sudre, C. J. Steves, S. Ourselin, T. D. Spector // Correspondence. — 2020. — Vol. 395. — P. e107–e108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31281-2
120. Menczer, F., Information Overload Helps Fake News Spread, and Social Media Knows It / F. Menczer, T. Hills. — 2020. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/information-overload-helps-fake-news-spread-and-social-media-knows-it/ (retrieved on 15.07.2021).
121. Metzger, M. Credibility for the 21st Century: Integrating Perspectives on Source, Message, and Media Credibility in the Contemporary Media Environment / M. Metzger, A. J. Flanagin, K. Eyal, D. R. Lemus, & R. M. McCann // Communication Yearbook. — 2003. — Vol. 27. — P. 293–335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2003.11679029
122. Metzger, M. J. Psychological approaches to credibility assessment online / M. J. Metzger, A. J. Flanagin // The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology. — 2015. — P. 445–466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118426456.ch20
123. Miller, S. M. Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat / S. M. Miller // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. — 1987. — Vol. 52. — No. 2. — P. 345–353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.345
124. Milkman, K. L. A. Mega-Study of Text-Based Nudges Encouraging Patients to Get Vaccinated at an Upcoming Doctor’s Appointment / K. L. Milkman, M. S. Patel, L. Gandhi // Rotman School of Management Working Paper No. 3780267, Columbia Business School Research Paper Forthcoming, 2021. — 75 p.
125. Moser, D. A. Years of life lost due to the psychosocial consequences of COVID-19 mitigation strategies based on Swiss data / D. A. Moser, J. Glaus, S. Frangou [et al.] // European Psychiatry. — 2020. — Vol. 63. — No. 1. — Article No. e58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.56
126. Odriozola-Chéné, J. Towards quality journalism in Ecuador: perspectives of journalists and media consumers / J. Odriozola-Chéné, I. Mendizábal // Cuadernos.info. — 2017. — Vol. 41. — P. 175–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.41.1100
127. Oh, J. The effects of message framing and source credibility on fake news credibility perception / J. Oh, K. Lee // Journal of Public Relations Research. — 2019. — Vol. 31. — No. 5–6. — P. 162–176.
128. Oh, H. J. When Do People Verify and Share Health Rumors on Social Media? The Effects of Message Importance, Health Anxiety, and Health Literacy / H. J. Oh, H. Lee // Journal of Health Communication International Perspectives. — 2019. — Vol. 24. — No. 11. — P. 837–847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2019.1677824
129. Oh, O. Community intelligence and social media services: A rumor theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises / O. Oh, M. Agrawal, H. R. Rao // MIS Quarterly. — 2013. — Vol. 37. — No. 2. — P. 407–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.05
130. Oyeyemi, S. O. Ebola, Twitter, and misinformation: a dangerous combination? / S. O. Oyeyemi, E. Gabarron, R. Wynn // BMJ. — 2014. — Vol. 349. — Article No. g6178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g6178
131. Pennycook, G. The implied truth effect: Attaching warnings to a subset of fake news stories increases perceived accuracy of stories without warnings / G. Pennycook, D. G. Rand // Management Science. — 2019. — Vol. 66. — No. 11. — P. 4944–4957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3478
132. Pendleton, S. C. Rumor research revisited and expanded / S. C. Pendleton // Language & Communication. — 1998. — Vol. 18. — No. 1. — P. 69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(97)00024-4
133. Pentland, A. Modeling and Prediction of Human Behavior / A. Pentland, A. Liu // Neural Computation. — 1999. — Vol. 11. — No. 1. — P. 229–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/089976699300016890
134. Person, B. Fear and stigma: the epidemic within the SARS outbreak / B. Person, F. Sy, K. Holton, B. Govert, A. Liang, National Center for Infectious Diseases, SARS Community Outreach Team // Emerging Infectious Diseases. — 2004. — Vol. 10. — No. 2. – P. 358–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1002.030750
135. Ravens-Sieberer, U. Quality of life and mental health in children and adolescents during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: results of a two-wave nationwide population-based study / U. Ravens-Sieberer, A. Kaman, M. Erhart, C. Otto, J. Devine, C. Löffler, L. Hurrelmann, M. Bullinger, C. Barkmann, N. A. Siegel, A. M. Simon, L. H. Wieler, R. Schlack, H. Hölling // European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. — 2023. — Vol. 32. — No. 4. — P. 575–588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01889-1; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DQTZFE
136. Rieh, S. Y. Understanding Judgment of Information Quality and Cognitive Authority in the WWW / S. Y. Rieh, N. J. Belkin // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. — 1998. — Vol. 53. — No. 2. — P. 145–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10017
137. Rieh, S. Y. Credibility — A Multidisciplinary Framework / S. Y. Rieh, D. R. Danielson // Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. — 2007. — Vol. 41. — No. 1. — P. 307–364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410114
138. Rini, R. Fake news and partisan epistemology / R. Rini // Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. — 2017. — Vol. 27(2). — P. 43–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2017.0025
139. Robinson, S. Anyone Can Know’: Citizen Journalism and the Interpretive Community of the Mainstream Press / S. Robinson, C. DeShano // Journalism: Theory, Practice, Criticism. — 2011. — No. 12. — No. 8. — P. 963–982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911415973
140. Rosas, O. Public Engagement with, and Trust in, Online News Media in French-Speaking Belgium. / O. Rosas // Recherches en Communication. — 2013. — No. 40. — P. 169–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14428/rec.v40i40.49363
141. Rosenblueth, A. Behavior, Purpose and Teleology / A. Rosenblueth, N. Wiener, J. Bigelow // Philosophy of Science. — 1943. — Vol. 10. — No. 1. — P. 18–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/286788
142. Rosenthal, P. I. Specificity, verifiability, and message credibility / P. I. Rosenthal // Quarterly Journal of Speech. — 1971. — Vol. 57. — No. 1. — P. 393–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637109383084
143. Rucker, D. Consumer conviction and commitment: an appraisal-based framework for attitude certainty / D. Rucker, Z. L. Tormala, R. E. Petty, P. Briñol // Journal of Consumption Psychology. — 2014. — Vol. 24. — No. 1. — P. 119–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.07.001
144. Roozenbeek, J. Prebunking interventions based on “inoculation” theory can reduce susceptibility to misinformation across cultures / J. Roozenbeek, S. van der Linden, T. Nygren // Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. — 2020. — Vol. 1. — No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37016//mr-2020-008
145. Schweiger, W. Media Credibility — Experience or Image? A Survey on the Credibility of the World Wide Web in Germany in Comparison to Other Media / W. Schweiger // European Journal of Communication. — 2000. — Vol. 15. — No. 1. — P. 37–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323100015001002; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JRRXSF
146. Sharareh, N. The Ebola Crisis and the Corresponding Public Behavior: A System Dynamics Approach / N. Sharareh, N. S. Sabounchi, H. Sayama, [et al.] // PLoS Currents. — 2016. — Vol. 8. — P. 67–81.
147. Short, S. E. Social Determinants and Health Behaviors: Conceptual Frames and Empirical Advances / S. E. Short, S. Mollborn // Current Opinion on Psychology. — 2015. — Vol. 5. — P. 78–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.05.002
148. Sternisko, A. The dark side of social movements: Social identity, non-conformity, and the lure of conspiracy theories / A. Sternisko, A. Cichocka, J. J. Van Bavel // Current Opinion in Psychology. — 2020. — Vol. 35. — P. 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.02.007; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LMFEHW
149. Sundar, S. S. Effect of Source Attribution on Perception of Online News Stories / S. S. Sundar // Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. — 1998. — No. 75. — P. 55–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909807500108
150. Tandoc Jr., E. C. Defining “Fake news” / E. C. Tandoc, Z. W. Lim, R. Ling // Digital Journalism. — 2018. — Vol. 6. — No. 2 — P. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
151. Tandoc Jr., E. C. The Journalist is Marketing the News: Social Media in The Gatekeeping Process / E. Tandoc, T. P. Vos // Journalism Practice. — 2016. — Vol. 10 — No. 8. — P. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1087811
152. Tasnim, S. Impact of Rumors and Misinformation on COVID-19 in Social Media / S. Tasnim, M. M. Hossain, H. Mazumder // Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health. — 2020. — Vol. 53. — No. 3. — P. 171–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.20.094; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WJIXIO
153. Teven, J. An Examination of Perceived Credibility of the 2008 Presidential Candidates: Relationships with Believability, Likeability and Deceptiveness / J. Teven // Human Communications. — 2008. — Vol. 11. — P. 383–400.
154. Thorburn, B. S. Birth control conspiracy beliefs, perceived discrimination, and contraception among African Americans: an exploratory study / B. S. Thorburn, L. M. Bogart // Journal of Health Psychology. — 2003. — Vol. 8. — No. 2. — P. 263–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105303008002669
155. Thorson, E. Changing Patterns of News Consumption and Participation. Information, Communication and Society / E. Thorson // Information Communication and Society. — 2008. — Vol. 11. — No. 4. — P. 473–489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801999027
156. Tormala, Z. L. When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion / Z. L. Tormala, P. Briñol, R. E. Petty // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. — 2006. — Vol. 42. — No. 5. — P. 684–691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.10.005
157. Trevena, L. J. Current Challenges When Using Numbers in Patient Decision Aids: Advanced Concepts / L. J. Trevena, C. Bonner, Y. Okan [et al.] // Medical Decision Making. — 2021. — Vol. 41. — No. 7. — P. 834–847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x21996342; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BVWVWM
158. Tseng, H. The elements of computer credibility / H. Tseng, B. J. Fogg // Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’99. — Pittsburg: ACM Press, 1999. — P. 80–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/302979.303001
159. Umeogu, B. Source сredibility: A philosophical analysis / B. Umeogu // Open Journal of Philosophy. — 2012. — Vol. 2. — No. 2. — P. 112–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2012.22017
160. Van Bavel, J. National Identity Predicts Public Health Support During a Global Pandemic: Results from 67 Nations / J. Van Bavel, A. Cichocka, V. Capraro [et al.] // Nature Communications. — 2020. — Vol. 13. — No. 1. — Article No. 517.
161. Bavel, J.J.V. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response / J.J. V. Bavel, K. Baicker, P.S. Boggio, [et al.] // Natural Human Behavior. — 2020. — Vol. 4. — P. 460–471.
162. van Prooijen, J. W. Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations / J. W. van Prooijen, K. M. Douglas // Memory Studies. — 2018. — Vol. 11. — No. 4. — P. 423–436.
163. Vosoughi, S. The spread of true and false news online / S. Vosoughi, D. Roy, S. Aral // Science. — 2018. — Vol. 359. — No. 6380. — P. 1146–1151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
164. Wall, M. Citizen Journalism: A Retrospective on What We Know, An Agenda for What We Don’t / M. Wall // Digital Journalism. — 2015. — Vol. 3. — No. 6. — P. 797–813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.1002513
165. Walker, G. T. P. The impact of COVID-19 and strategies for mitigation and suppression in low- and middle-income countries / G. T. P. Walker, C. Whittaker, O. Watson // Science. — 2020. — Vol. 369. — No. 6502. — P. 413–422.
166. Wang, C. The Impact of COVID-19 on Anxiety in Chinese University Students / C. Wang, H. Zhao // Frontiers in Psychology. — 2020. — Vol. 11. — Article No. 1168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01168
167. Watts, W. A. Persistence of induced opinion change and retention of the inducing message contents / W. A. Watts, W. J. McGuire // The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. — 1964. — Vol. 68. — No. 3. — P. 233–241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041081
168. Wiener, J. L. Source Credibility: on the Independent Effects of Trust and Expertise / J. L. Wiener, J. C. Mowen // Advances in Consumer Research. — 1986. — Vol. 13. — P. 306–310.
169. Wu, K. False rumors detection on Sina Weibo by propagation structure / K. Wu, S. Yang, K. Q. Zhu // 2015 IEEE 31st International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). — Seoul: IEEE, 2015. — 1602 p. — P. 651–662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2015.7113322
170. Zannettou, S. The Web of False Information: Rumors, Fake News, Hoaxes, Clickbait, and Various Other Shenanigans / S. Zannettou, M. Sirivianos, J. Blackburn, N. Kourtellis // Journal of Data and Information Quality. — 2019. — Vol. 11. — No. 3. — Article No. 10. — P. 1–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3309699
171. Electronic Resources
172. Ärzteblatt. Wir sehen, dass die Kinder mit zunehmender Länge des Lockdowns immer mehr‚ am Rad drehen. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrichten/120837/Wir-sehen-dass-die-Kinder-mit-zunehmender-Laenge-des-Lockdowns-immer-mehr-am-Rad-drehen (retrieved on 09.07.2021).
173. Buchholz, K. Global Vaccine Timeline Stretches to 2023. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.statista.com/chart/24064/covid-19-vaccination-timeline-global/ (retrieved on 09.07.2021).
174. Bundesregierung (ed.). Coronavirus: Wo stehen wir in der Pandemie und wie handeln wir? — Text: electronic.– URL: https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/themen/coronavirus (retrieved on 07.07.2021).
175. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (ed.). Zum gesellschaftlichen Umgang mit der Corona-Pandemie. Ergebnisse der Mannheimer Corona-Studie. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://m.bpb.de/apuz/314345/zum-gesellschaftlichen-umgang-mit-der-corona-pandemie (retrieved on 09.07.2021).
176. CDC (ed.). SARS-CoV-2 Variant Classifications and Definitions — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/variant-info.html (retrieved on 21.06.2021).
177. CDC (ed.). Implementation of Mitigation Strategies for Communities with Local COVID-19 Transmission. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/community-mitigation.html (retrieved on 08.07.2021).
178. Cement, J. Number of global social network users 2017–2025. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/ (retrieved on 15.10.2020).
179. Center for Preparedness and Response. Responding to Rumors and Misinformation-Emergency Preparedness and Response. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7853571/pdf/20-3139.pdf (retrieved on 15.10.2020).
180. Dai, H. Behavioral Nudges Increase COVID-19 Vaccinations, Preprint at SSRN. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3817832 (retrieved on 19.07.2021).
181. DESTATIS. Bevölkerungsstand — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Bevoelkerungsstand/_inhalt.html (retrieved on 20.10.2020).
182. ECDC. Infographic: Mutation of SARS-CoV-2 — current variants of concern. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/covid-19-infographic-mutations-current-variants-concern (retrieved on 21.04.2021).
183. Ellis, E. G. The coronavirus outbreak is a petri dish for conspiracy theories / E. G. Ellis. — 2020. — Text : electronic. — URL: https://www.wired.com/story/coronavirus-conspiracy-theories/ (retrieved on 13.07.2021).
184. Engels, B. Corona: Stresstest für die Digitalisierung in Deutschland / B. Engels // IW-Kurzbericht. — 2020. — Vol. 23. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.iwkoeln.de/studien/barbara-engels-stresstest-fuer-die- digitalisierung-in-deutschland-463744.html
185. Financial Times (ed.). Lockdowns compared: tracking governments’ coronavirus responses. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://ig.ft.com/coronavirus-lockdowns/ (retrieved on 08.07.2021).
186. Frenkel, S. Surge of virus misinformation stumps Facebook and Twitter / S. Frenkel, D. Alba, R. Zhong // The New York Times. — 2020. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/08/technology/coronavirus-misinformation-social-media.html (retrieved on 13.07.2021).
187. Gottfried, J. News Use Across Social Media Platforms / J. Gottfried, E. Shearer. — Pew Research Center. — 2016. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/ (retrieved on 20.10.2020).
188. Kamplean, A. Influence of emotion on fake news sharing behavior: The case study from Thailand / A. Kamplean // ITS Online Event. — 2020. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/224861/1/Kamplean.pdf.
189. Klaus, J. Internationale Studie — Wie Fakenews über Corona den Menschen schaden / J. Klaus // Bundesverband Deutscher Stiftungen. — 2020. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/digitales/coronavirus-fakenews-studie-infodemie-100.html (retrieved on 06.07.2021).
190. Macmillan Dictionary (ed.). Credibility. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/credibility (retrieved on 21.06.2021).
191. Menczer, F. Information Overload Helps Fake News Spread, and Social Media Knows It / F. Menczer, T. Hills // Scientific American. — 2020. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/information-overload-helps-fake-news-spread-and-social-media-knows-it/ (retrieved on 15.07.2021).
192. MIT Media Lab. The Spread of True and False Information Online. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/the-spread-of-false-and-true-info-online/frequently-asked-questions/#faq-what-does-this-research-tell-us-about-human-behavior (retrieved on 15.07.2021).
193. National Institutes of Health (NIH). Social and Behavioral Theories. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://%3A%2F%2Fobssr.od.nih.gov%2Fsites%2Fobssr%2Ffiles%2FSocial-and-Behavioral-Theories.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2Ittguew3qt0po6IEx2CYM&opi=89978449 (retrieved on 04.03.2024).
194. Oremus, W. Stop Calling Everything Fake News / W. Oremus // Slate. — 2016. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2016/12/stop_calling_everything_fake_news.html (retrieved on 15.10.2020).
195. Resnick, P. RumorLens: A System for Analyzing the Impact of Rumors and Corrections in Social Media / P. Resnick, S. Carton, S. Park, Y. Shen, N. Zeffer // Computer Science. — 2017. — URL: http://scarton.people.si.umich.edu/files/papers/Resnick%20et%20al.%20-%202014%20-%20RumorLens%20A%20System%20for%20Analyzing%20the%20Impact%20of%20Ru.pdf (retrieved on 03.07.2021).
196. Statista. Number of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) deaths worldwide as of July 5, 2021, by country. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1093256/novel-coronavirus-2019ncov-deaths-worldwide-by-country/ (retrieved on 07.07.2021).
197. Statista. Number of coronavirus (COVID-19) deaths in Germany in 2021, by gender and age. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1105512/coronavirus-covid-19-deaths-by-gender-germany/ (retrieved on 07.07.2021).
198. Statista. Most likely perceived cause of food and supply shortages in local grocery stores due to coronavirus (COVID-19) in the United States as of March 15, 2020. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1105594/coronavirus-cause-grocery-store-food-and-supply-shortages-us/ (retrieved on 11.07.2021).
199. Statista. Fühlen Sie sich durch die Corona-Maßnahmen persönlich stark eingeschränkt? (Zustimmung nach Parteianhängerschaft). — Text: electronic. — URL: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/1140101/umfrage/corona-krise-einschraenkungen-durch-massnahmen/ (retrieved on 24.09.2020).
200. Statista. Number of social network users worldwide from 2017 to 2025. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/ (retrieved on 15.10.2020).
201. Statista. Age and Gender Structure in Germany. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1086197/men-and-women-by-age-group-germany/ (retrieved on 29.12.2021).
202. Tagesschau. Corona-Demo in Berlin — Welche Bedingungen gelten für ein Verbot? — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/faq-demonstration-verbot-101.html (retrieved on 28.08.2020).
203. WHO. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200710-covid-19-sitrep-172.pdf. (retrieved on 13.07.2021).
204. WHO. Home Care for Patients with COVID-19 Presenting with Mild Symptoms and Management of Their Contacts. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.who.int/publications-detail/home-care-for-patients-with-suspected-novel-coronavirus-(ncov)-infection-presenting-with-mild-symptoms-and-management-of-contacts (retrieved on 16.07.2021).
205. WHO. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Advice for the Public: Mythbusters. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/myth-busters (retrieved on 16.07.2021).
206. WHO. Ebola Virus Disease — Democratic Republic of the Congo. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.who.int/csr/don/28-november-2019-ebola-drc/en/. (retrieved on 06.07.2021).
207. World Economic Forum. Key milestones in the spread of the coronavirus pandemic — Text: electronic. — URL: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/ 2020/04/coronavirus-spread-covid19-pandemic-timeline-milestones/ (retrieved on 15.12.2021).
208. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020 Framework. — Text: electronic. — URL: https://wayback.archive-it.org/5774/20220413182850/https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/ (retrieved on 09.12.2020)
